Website Edition: April/May 2013

Journal Featured Article

Movement Disorders
DOI: 10.1002/mds.25213

β-amyloid and postural instability and gait difficulty in Parkinson's disease at risk for dementia

Authors: Martijn L.T.M. Müller PhD1,*, Kirk A. Frey MD, PhD1,2, Myria Petrou MA, MBChB, MS1,3, Vikas Kotagal MD2, Robert A. Koeppe PhD1, Roger L. Albin MD2,4 and Nicolaas I. Bohnen MD, PhD1,2,4

1 Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
2 Department of Neurology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
3 Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
4 Neurology Service and GRECC, VAAAHS, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA

*Correspondence to: Dr. Martijn L.T.M. Müller, Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine, Functional Neuroimaging, Cognitive, and Mobility Laboratory, University of Michigan, 24 Frank LLoyd Wright Dr, Box #362, Ann Arbor MI 48105, USA; mtmuller@med.umich.edu

Funding agencies: This work was supported by National Institutes of Health (grant nos.: P01 NS015655 and R01 NS070856), the Michael J. Fox Foundation, and the Department of Veterans Affairs.

Relevant conflicts of interest/financial disclosures: Nothing to report.

Full financial disclosures and author roles may be found in the online version of this article.

Article first published online: 12 DEC 2012

Abstract

Although motor impairments in Parkinson's disease (PD) are attributed to nigrostriatal dopaminergic denervation, postural instability and gait difficulty (PIGD) features are less responsive to dopaminergic medications. PIGD features are a risk factor also for the development of dementia in PD (PDD). These observations suggest that nondopaminergic mechanisms may contribute to axial motor impairments. The aim was to perform a correlative PET study to examine the relationship between neocortical β-amyloid deposition ([11C]-Pittsburgh Compound B), nigrostriatal dopaminergic denervation ([11C]-dihydrotetrabenazine), and PIGD feature severity in PD patients at risk for dementia. This was a cross-sectional study of 44 PD patients (11 female and 33 male; 69.5 ± 6.6 years of age; 7.0 ± 4.8 years motor disease duration; mean H & Y stage: 2.7 ± 0.5) who underwent PET, motor feature severity assessment using the Movement Disorder Society revised UPDRS, and the Dementia Rating Scale (DRS). Linear regression (R2adj = 0.147; F4,39 = 2.85; P = 0.036) showed that increased PIGD feature severity was associated with increased neocortical [11C]-Pittsburgh Compound B binding (β = 0.346; t39 = 2.13; P = 0.039) while controlling for striatal [11C]-dihydrotetrabenazine binding, age, and DRS total score. Increased neocortical β-amyloid deposition, even at low-range levels, is associated with higher PIGD feature severity in PD patients at risk for dementia. This finding may explain why the PIGD motor phenotype is a risk factor for the development of PDD. © 2012 Movement Disorder Society

Volume 28, Issue 3, pages 296–301, March 2013

Read more

Article Text

Postural instability and gait difficulty (PIGD) features are among the most disabling motor features of Parkinson's disease (PD) and are least responsive to dopaminergic medications.[1] There is a need to explore nondopaminergic mechanisms of PIGD, because the presence of PIGD features is a critical determinant of quality of life in PD.[3]

PD is a multisystem neurodegeneration syndrome manifesting with both motor and cognitive morbidity. There are several lines of evidence showing an intrinsic association between cognition and mobility in PD. First, the PIGD motor subtype is a risk factor for the development of dementia in PD (PDD).[5-7] Second, walking and/or maintaining upright balance is affected by concurrent cognitive tasks[8] Third, cognitive impairment is a risk factor for falls.[9] Although some aspects of cognitive dysfunction are related to striatal dopaminergic deficits,[10] dopamine (DA) replacement therapy has mixed effects on cognition in PD.[11] Given the ambiguous role of DA in the etiology of both PIGD features and cognitive impairment, nondopaminergic processes may underlie the relationship between cognition and PIGD features in PD.

In Alzheimer's disease (AD), deposition of β-amyloid (Aβ) plaques occurs early in disease[13] and is associated with cognitive impairment.[14] Postmortem findings of Alzheimer's pathology are found also in the brains of PD patients, typically reflecting late-stage (and age-related) pathology.[15] However, in vivo imaging studies of Aβ using 11C-Pittsburgh compound-B ([11C]-PiB) PET generally show lower, more-variable levels of Aβ in the neocortex of subjects with PD or PDD, when compared to AD.[16-20]The effect of neocortical Aβ on clinical features of PD, particularly with respect to DA nonresponsive motor symptoms, has not been well studied. Given the severe striatal dopaminergic deficits of PD, it is possible that comorbid Aβ pathology may aggravate specific clinical features of PD.

The aim of this study was to examine the relationship between neocortical Aβ burden, estimated in vivo with [11C]-PiB, and ratings of PIGD features in PD patients with mild cognitive impairment or with other dementia risk factors. The effect of nigrostriatal dopaminergic denervation on these features was taken into account by in vivo [11C]-DTBZ PET imaging of the vesicular monoaminergic transporter, type 2. We hypothesized that increased neocortical [11C]-PiB retention is associated with increased PIGD feature severity.

Patients and Methods

Subjects

This cross-sectional study included 44 PD patients with either mild cognitive impairment symptoms or known risk factors for developing PD-associated dementia, specifically older age, longer disease duration, or evidence of PIGD features.[6] These patients underwent a [11C]-PiB scan as part of a larger ongoing cohort study (National Institutes of Health P01 NS015655). Detailed demographic and disease severity information is provided in Table 1.

Table 1. Detailed demographic information, modified H & Y staging,[46] and medication use, including levodopa equivalent dose[47] in milligrams (mg)

Gender
1.      Values represent mean ± standard deviation (range). Abbreviation: CL, carbidopa-levodopa.
Gender  
Female N = 11
Male N = 33
Age, years 69.5 ± 6.6 (55–84)
Motor disease duration, years 7.0 ± 4.8 (1–20)
Modified H & Y staging 2.7 ± 0.5
1.5 N = 1
2.0 N = 3
2.5 N = 23
3.0 N = 14
4.0 N = 3
Dopaminergic medication use
CL N = 23
DA agonist N = 6
Combination CL and DA agonist N = 15
Levodopa equivalent dose (mg) 812.4 ± 630.3 (100–3,180)

Patients met the UK Parkinson's Disease Society Brain Bank clinical diagnostic criteria.[23] The diagnosis of PD was confirmed by the presence of a typical pattern of nigrostriatal dopaminergic denervation on [11C]-DTBZ PET imaging.[24]

All subjects were on DA replacement therapy (see also Table 1). None of the subjects were on anticholinergic or cholinesterase inhibitor drugs. Subjects were clinically examined and imaged in the morning after overnight withholding of their dopaminergic drugs.

Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects before research procedures. The University of Michigan Medical School Institutional Review Board (Ann Arbor, MI) for human studies approved the study.

Clinical Assessments

Clinical evaluations included PD motor feature assessment using the Movement Disorder Society revised UPDRS (MDS-UPDRS).[25] The PIGD score was calculated as the sum of items 2.11 to 2.13 and 3.9 to 3.13, and a non-PIGD score was calculated as the sum of the non-PIGD items of parts II and III of the MDS-UPDRS. Cognitive capacity was assessed with the Dementia Rating Scale (DRS)[27] with subjects on their regular dopaminergic medications.

MRI

All subjects underwent brain MRI for anatomic coregistration with PET. MRI was performed on a 3 T Philips Achieva system (Philips, Best, The Netherlands) utilizing an eight-channel head coil and the “ISOVOX” exam card protocol primarily designed to yield isotropic spatial resolution. A standard T1-weighted series of a three-dimensional (3D) inversion recovery-prepared turbo field echo was performed in the sagittal plane using the following: repetition time/echo time/inversion time = 9.8/4.6/1041 ms; turbo factor = 200; single average; field of view = 240 × 200 × 160 mm; and acquired matrix = 240 × 200. One hundred and sixty slices were reconstructed to 1-mm isotropic resolution.

PET Imaging

PET imaging was performed in 3D imaging mode using an ECAT HR+ tomograph (Siemens Molecular Imaging, Inc., Knoxville, TN), which acquires 63 transaxial slices (slice thickness = 2.4 mm; intrinsic in-plane resolution = 4.1 mm full width at half maximum over a 15.2-cm axial field of view). A NeuroShield (Scanwell Systems, Montreal, Quebec, Canada) head-holder/shielding unit was attached to the patient bed to reduce the contribution of detected photon events originating from the body outside the scanner field of view. Before the radioligand injections, a 5-minute transmission scan was acquired using rotating 68Ge rods for attenuation correction of emission data using the standard vendor-supplied segmentation and reprojection routines.

[11C]-DTBZ (no-carrier-added (+)-α-[11C]-dihydrotetrabenazine) was prepared as reported previously.[28] [11C]-DTBZ PET scans were performed using a bolus/infusion protocol acquiring 15 emission scans over 60 minutes (4 × 30 seconds; 3 × 1 minute; 2 × 2.5 minutes; 2 × 5 minutes; and 4 × 10 minutes), with a priming bolus of 55%, followed by continuous infusion of the remaining 45% over the study duration using a dose of 555 MBq.

[11C]-PiB (N-methyl-[11C]2-(4′-methylaminophenyl)-6-hydroxybenzothiazole; Pittsburgh Compound B) was synthesized following published methods.[29] [11C]-PiB PET scans were performed using a bolus/infusion protocol acquiring 17 emission scans over 80 minutes (same as [11C]-DTBZ scan sequence plus two additional 10-minute scans), with a priming bolus of 40%, followed by continuous infusion of the remaining 60% over the study duration using a dose of 666 MBq.

All subjects were studied supine, with eyes and ears unoccluded, resting quietly in a dimly lit room.

PET Analysis

All dynamic PET imaging frames were spatially coregistered within subjects with a rigid body transformation to reduce the effects of subject motion during the imaging session.[31] These motion-corrected PET frames were spatially coregistered to the MRI using SPM8 software (Wellcome Trust Center for Neuroimaging, London, UK). IDL image-analysis software (Research Systems, Inc., Boulder, CO) was used to manually trace volumes of interest (VOIs) on the MRI scan. Traced VOIs included the striatum (caudate and putamen), thalamus, cerebellum, and the neocortex. Neocortical VOI definition used semiautomated thresholding delineation of the neocortical gray-matter signal on MRI images.

Time-activity curves for each VOI were generated from the spatially aligned PET frames. [11C]-PiB and [11C]-DTBZ PET distribution volume ratio (DVR), a measure of binding, was estimated by using Logan's plot graphical analysis method,[32] with the time-activity curves as the input function and the cerebellar gray matter as reference tissue for [11C]-PiB and the neocortex as reference tissue for [11C]-DTBZ.

Statistical Analysis

Variables were rank-order transformed to mitigate the effect of possible outliers. Linear regression analysis was performed to assess the association between PIGD subscore and neocortical [11C]-PiB DVR while controlling for striatal [11C]-DTBZ DVR, age, and DRS total score. Post-hoc analyses were performed to assess the effects of subcortical [11C]-PiB DVR on PIGD subscore. Analyses were performed using PASW Statistics 18 (IBM, Chicago, Ill).

Results

Descriptive results for the MDS-UPDRS, DRS, and PET ligands are presented in Table 2. Subjects had mild to moderate motor disease severity and a mean DRS total score that was within the mildly impaired range.[33] Across all subjects, neocortical [11C]-PiB binding was generally in the low range, but regionally more elevated in the frontal and temporal lobes and the cingulate gyrus (Fig. 1).

image Figure 1. Parametric lateral and medial projections of [11C]-PiB binding averaged across all 44 subjects. Overall, there was low-range binding; however, regionally increased binding was observed in the cingulate gyrus as well as temporal and frontal lobes. There was high nonspecific white-matter [11C]-PiB binding in the brainstem and thalamus. RT, right; LT, left; LAT, lateral; MED, medial.

Table 2. Mean ± standard deviation (range) for DRS, MDS-UPDRS summed PIGD and non-PIGD subscores, and PET ligands

DRS (0–144) 136.4 ± 5.0 (123–144)
MDS-UPDRS
Motor Aspects of Experiences of Daily Living (0–52) 10.6 ± 5.9 (2–26)
Motor Examination (0–132) 37.8 ± 14.6 (14.5–69.5)
PIGD subscore (0–32) 9.0 ± 4.9 (1.5–27.0)
non-PIGD subscore (0–152) 39.4 ± 14.2 (18.0–72.5)
PET
Striatal [11C]-DBTZ DVR 1.90 ± 0.31 (1.50–2.94)
Neocortical [11C]-PiB DVR 1.16 ± 0.16 (0.93–1.78)
Thalamic [11C]-PiB DVR 1.54 ± 0.13 (1.19–1.80)
Striatal [11C]-PiB DVR 1.37 ± 0.19 (1.07–2.10)

Linear regression analysis showed that neocortical [11C]-PiB binding (β = 0.346; t39 = 2.13; P = 0.039) significantly predicted MDS-UPDRS PIGD subscore (R2adj = 0.147; F4,39 = 2.85; P = 0.036; Fig. 2), whereas there were no significant effects of striatal [11C]-DTBZ binding (β = −0.232, t39 = −1.52; P = 0.136), age (β = 0.125; t39 = 0.85; P = 0.400), or DRS total score (β = 0.100; t39 = 0.62; P = 0.538). Additional linear regression analysis showed that the non-PIGD subscore could not be significantly predicted by the same independent variables (R2adj = 0.072; F4,39 = 1.84; P = 0.142). Reanalysis with possible influential outliers removed (see also Fig.2) resulted in the same findings (results not shown).

image Figure 2. Scatterplot of neocortical [11C]-PiB binding against PIGD subscore across all subjects. Possible influential outliers are identified by diamonds.

Post-hoc linear regression analyses were performed to examine possible effects of subcortical [11C]-PiB binding on PIGD subscore. These analyses showed that neither striatal [11C]-PiB binding nor thalamic [11C]-PiB binding significantly predicted PIGD subscores while controlling for striatal [11C]-DTBZ binding, age, and DRS total score (results not shown).

Discussion

We examined the relationship between PIGD feature severity and neocortical Aβ burden in PD patients with mild cognitive impairment or at risk for development of dementia. We found that increased PIGD feature severity was associated with increased neocortical Aβ burden while controlling for the effect of possible confounding variables, such as the degree of striatal dopaminergic denervation, age, or the degree of cognitive capacity impairment. This was a PIGD feature-specific effect, because neocortical Aβ burden did not have an association with non-PIGD feature severity. Furthermore, the results remained significant even after the exclusion of subjects with more-severe neocortical amyloidopathy. Subcortical Aβ burden did not affect PIGD feature severity.

Dopaminergic denervation is severe in PD, even at the onset of the disease.[24] For example, Frey et al. have reported on reductions of striatal dopaminergic [11C]-DTBZ binding of 61% in the putamen and 43% in the caudate nucleus, with no overlap in putamen [11C]-DTBZ binding between individual elderly controls and PD patients.[34] In our study, striatal [11C]-DTBZ DVR was in the same range. The results of this study support our hypothesis that in the presence of severe striatal dopaminergic denervation, comorbid neocortical amyloidopathy may have exacerbating effects on gait and postural stability, even when the amyloidopathy is at below-AD level of Aβ-binding levels.[35] This suggests that relatively low levels of comorbid neocortical Aβ plaques are of pathophysiological significance in PD and may aggravate motor impairments of PD patients.

Further evidence for a possible role of cortical amyloidopathy on the etiology of balance and gait impairments can be found in AD patients. Subtle changes in balance and gait occur early in the course of AD.[36] Several studies have shown that gait and static standing balance characteristics of AD patients are different from healthy subjects[37-39] These changes are especially evident when there are additional cognitive task demands while walking.[40-42] These observations support an intrinsic relationship between cognition and motor control functions and suggest a possible pathogenic role for neocortical amyloidopathy in gait dysfunction.

The cross-sectional study design and regression analyses were limitations of our study, because these do not allow for causal assessment of the relationship between PIDG feature severity and the degree of neocortical amyloidopathy. Prospective studies are needed to confirm that amyloidopathy is an important mechanism underlying both progression of PIGD motor features and cognitive decline in PD.

PD is a multisystem neurodegenerative disorder.[43] Our study shows that, in the presence of severe nigrostriatal dopaminergic denervation, even relatively low levels of comorbid neocortical amyloidopathy may augment gait and postural impairments in PD. These results and our recent findings of an association between cortical amyloidopathy and the degree of cognitive impairment in PD patients[44] suggest that cortical amyloidopathy may provide a common mechanism for PIGD features and cognitive impairment. This may explain why the PIGD motor phenotype is a risk factor for the development of PDD. Several promising therapies have been tested in AD patients that target Aβ production, aggregation, or accumulation, which, likely, are most effective when applied to asymptomatic patients with very early signs of AD pathology.[45]Future studies could evaluate whether early treatment of amyloidopathy may modify the progression of PIGD features in PD.

Acknowledgments: The authors thank Christine Minderovic, Kristine Wernette, Virginia Rogers, the PET technologists, cyclotron operators, and chemists for their assistance.

Author Roles

(1) Research Project: A. Conception, B. Organization, C. Execution; (2) Statistical Analysis: A. Design, B. Execution, C. Review and Critique; (3) Manuscript: A. Writing of the First Draft, B. Review and Critique.

M.L.T.M.: 1A, 1B, 1C, 2A, 2B, 3A

K.A.F.: 1A, 1B, 1C, 2A, 2C, 3B

M.P.: 2C, 3B

V.K.: 2C, 3B

R.K.: 1A, 1B, 1C, 2C, 3B

R.L.A: 1A, 1B, 1C, 2C, 3B

N.I.B.: 1A, 1B, 1C, 2A, 2C, 3B

Financial Disclosures: M.L.T.M. has received research support from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) and the Department of Veteran Affairs (VA). K.A.F. has received research support from the NIH, GE Healthcare, and AVID Radiopharmaceuticals; served as a consultant for AVID Radiopharmaceuticals, MIMVista, Bayer-Schering, and GE Healthcare; and holds equity (common stock) in GE, Bristol-Myers, Merck, and Novo-Nordisk. V.K. has received research support from the American Academy of Neurology Clinical Research Training Fellowship. R.K. has received research support from the NIH; has served as a consultant for Johnson & Johnson, Merck, and AVID Radiopharmaceuticals; and serves on the board of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism. R.L.A. has received research support from the NIH and the VA; serves on the editorial boards of Neurology, Experimental Neurology, and Neurobiology of Disease; and has served on the Data Safety and Monitoring Boards for the QE3 and HORIZON trials. N.I.B. has received research support from the NIH and the VA.

References

  1. Bohnen NI, Cham R. Postural control, gait, and dopamine functions in parkinsonian movement disorders. Clin Geriatr Med2006;22:797–812.
  2. Bloem BR, Beckley DJ, van Dijk JG, Zwinderman AH, Remler MP, Roos RA. Influence of dopaminergic medication on automatic postural responses and balance impairment in Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord1996;11:509–521.
    Direct Link:
  3. Muslimovic D, Post B, Speelman JD, Schmand B, de Haan RJ. Determinants of disability and quality of life in mild to moderate Parkinson disease. Neurology2008;70:2241–2247.
  4. Schrag A, Jahanshahi M, Quinn N. What contributes to quality of life in patients with Parkinson's disease?J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry2000;69:308–312.
  5. Post B, Merkus MP, de Haan RJ, Speelman JD. Prognostic factors for the progression of Parkinson's disease: a systematic review. Mov Disord2007;22:1839–1851.
    Direct Link:
  6. Burn DJ, Rowan EN, Allan LM, Molloy S, O'Brien JT, McKeith IG. Motor subtype and cognitive decline in Parkinson's disease, Parkinson's disease with dementia, and dementia with Lewy bodies. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry2006;77:585–589.
  7. Alves G, Larsen JP, Emre M, Wentzel-Larsen T, Aarsland D. Changes in motor subtype and risk for incident dementia in Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord2006;21:1123–1130.
    Direct Link:
  8. Hausdorff JM, Balash J, Giladi N. Effects of cognitive challenge on gait variability in patients with Parkinson's disease. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol2003;16:53–58.
  9. Hausdorff JM, Doniger GM, Springer S, Yogev G, Simon ES, Giladi N. A common cognitive profile in elderly fallers and in patients with Parkinson's disease: the prominence of impaired executive function and attention. Exp Aging Res2006;32:411–429.
  10. Cools R. Dopaminergic control of the striatum for high-level cognition. Curr Opin Neurobiol2011;21:402–407.
  11. Cools R. Dopaminergic modulation of cognitive function-implications for L-DOPA treatment in Parkinson's disease. Neurosci Biobehav Rev2006;30:1–23.
  12. MacDonald PA, Monchi O. Differential effects of dopaminergic therapies on dorsal and ventral striatum in Parkinson's disease: implications for cognitive function. Parkinsons Dis2011;2011:572743.
  13. Braak H, Braak E. Staging of Alzheimer's disease-related neurofibrillary changes. Neurobiol Aging1995;16:271–278.
  14. Jack CR, Jr., Lowe VJ, Weigand SD, et al. Serial PIB and MRI in normal, mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease: implications for sequence of pathological events in Alzheimer's disease. Brain2009;132:1355–1365.
  15. Halliday G, Hely M, Reid W, Morris J. The progression of pathology in longitudinally followed patients with Parkinson's disease. Acta Neuropathol2008;115:409–415.
  16. Foster ER, Campbell MC, Burack MA, et al. Amyloid imaging of Lewy body-associated disorders. Mov Disord2010;25:2516–2523.
    Direct Link:
  17. Villemagne VL, Okamura N, Pejoska S, et al. In vivo assessment of vesicular monoamine transporter type 2 in dementia with lewy bodies and Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol2011;68:905–912.
  18. Maetzler W, Reimold M, Liepelt I, et al. [11C]PIB binding in Parkinson's disease dementia. Neuroimage2008;39:1027–1033.
  19. Edison P, Rowe CC, Rinne JO, et al. Amyloid load in Parkinson's disease dementia and Lewy body dementia measured with [11C]PIB positron emission tomography. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry2008;79:1331–1338.
  20. Gomperts SN, Rentz DM, Moran E, et al. Imaging amyloid deposition in Lewy body diseases. Neurology2008;71:903–910.
  21. Riedel O, Klotsche J, Spottke A, et al. Cognitive impairment in 873 patients with idiopathic Parkinson's disease. Results from the German Study on Epidemiology of Parkinson's Disease with Dementia (GEPAD). J Neurol2008;255:255–264.
  22. Aarsland D, Kurz MW. The epidemiology of dementia associated with Parkinson disease. J Neurol Sci2010;289:18–22.
  23. Hughes AJ, Daniel SE, Kilford L, Lees AJ. Accuracy of clinical diagnosis of idiopathic Parkinson's disease: a clinico-pathological study of 100 cases. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry1992;55:181–184.
  24. Bohnen NI, Albin RL, Koeppe RA, et al. Positron emission tomography of monoaminergic vesicular binding in aging and Parkinson disease. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab2006;26:1198–1212.
  25. Goetz CG, Fahn S, Martinez-Martin P, et al. Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS): process, format, and clinimetric testing plan. Mov Disord2007;22:41–47.
    Direct Link:
  26. Goetz CG, Tilley BC, Shaftman SR, et al. Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS): scale presentation and clinimetric testing results. Mov Disord2008;23:2129–2170.
    Direct Link:
  27. Mattis S. Dementia Rating Scale. Odessa, FL:Psychological Assessment Resources;1998.
  28. Jewett DM, Kilbourn MR, Lee LC. A simple synthesis of [11C]dihydrotetrabenazine (DTBZ). Nucl Med Biol1997;24:197–199.
  29. Wang Y, Klunk WE, Debnath ML, et al. Development of a PET/SPECT agent for amyloid imaging in Alzheimer's disease. J Mol Neurosci2004;24:55–62.
  30. Wang Y, Klunk WE, Huang GF, Debnath ML, Holt DP, Mathis CA. Synthesis and evaluation of 2-(3′-iodo-4′-aminophenyl)-6-hydroxybenzothiazole for in vivo quantitation of amyloid deposits in Alzheimer's disease. J Mol Neurosci2002;19:11–16.
  31. Minoshima S, Frey KA, Koeppe RA, Foster NL, KuhlDE. A diagnostic approach in Alzheimer's disease using three-dimensional stereotactic surface projections of fluorine-18-FDG PET. J Nucl Med1995;36:1238–1248.
  32. LoganJ, Fowler JS, VolkowND, Wang GJ, Ding YS, Alexoff DL. Distribution volume ratios without blood sampling from graphical analysis of PET data. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab1996;16:834–840.
  33. Villeneuve S, Rodrigues-Brazete J, Joncas S, Postuma RB, Latreille V, Gagnon JF. Validity of the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale to detect mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease and REM sleep behavior disorder. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord2011;31:210–217.
  34. Frey KA, Koeppe RA, Kilbourn MR, et al. Presynaptic monoaminergic vesicles in Parkinson's disease and normal aging. Ann Neurol1996;40:873–884.
    Direct Link:
  35. Pike KE, Ellis KA, Villemagne VL, et al. Cognition and beta-amyloid in preclinical Alzheimer's disease: data from the AIBL study. Neuropsychologia2011;49:2384–2390.
  36. Scherder E, Eggermont L, Swaab D, et al. Gait in ageing and associated dementias; its relationship with cognition. Neurosci Biobehav Rev2007;31:485–497.
  37. Suttanon P, Hill KD, Said CM, Logiudice D, LautenschlagerNT, Dodd KJ. Balance and mobility dysfunction and falls risk in older people with mild to moderate Alzheimer disease. Am J Phys Med Rehabil2012;91:12–23.
  38. Beauchet O, Allali G, Berrut G, Hommet C, Dubost V, Assal F. Gait analysis in demented subjects: interests and perspectives. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat2008;4:155–160.
  39. Sheridan PL, Hausdorff JM. The role of higher-level cognitive function in gait: executive dysfunction contributes to fall risk in Alzheimer's disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord2007;24:125–137.
  40. Sheridan PL, Solomont J, Kowall N, Hausdorff JM. Influence of executive function on locomotor function: divided attention increases gait variability in Alzheimer's disease. J Am Geriatr Soc2003;51:1633–1637.
    Direct Link:
  41. Montero-Odasso M, Muir SW, Speechley M. Dual-task complexity affects gait in people with mild cognitive impairment: the interplay between gait variability, dual tasking, and risk of falls. Arch Phys Med Rehabil2012;93:293–299.
  42. Muir SW, Speechley M, Wells J, Borrie M, Gopaul K, Montero-Odasso M. Gait assessment in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease: the effect of dual-task challenges across the cognitive spectrum. Gait Posture2012;35:96–100.
  43. Langston JW. The Parkinson's complex: parkinsonism is just the tip of the iceberg. Ann Neurol2006;59:591–596.
    Direct Link:
  44. Petrou M, Bohnen N, Müller M, Koeppe R, Albin R, Frey K. Aβ amyloid deposition in Parkinson disease patients at risk for development of dementia. Neurology2012;79:1161–1167.
  45. Golde TE, Schneider LS, Koo EH. Anti-abeta therapeutics in Alzheimer's disease: the need for a paradigm shift. Neuron2011;69:203–213.
  46. Hoehn MM, Yahr MD. Parkinsonism: onset, progression, and mortality. Neurology1967;17:427–442.
  47. Tomlinson CL, Stowe R, Patel S, Rick C, Gray R, Clarke CE. Systematic review of levodopa dose equivalency reporting in Parkinson's disease. Mov Disord2010;25:2649–2653.
    Direct Link: